Category Archives: Gnostic

Shiva and Dionysus

The gods Shiva and Dionysus are two of the most complex and popular deities from ancient pantheons, and as such, both figure prominently in the cultural practices of present day. Despite their apparent differences, both Shiva and Dionysus seem to be related in a number of ways. In this paper, I will discuss the parallels between Shiva and Dionysus, with an emphasis on the most recent peer-reviewed research. 

Both Shiva and Dionysus have strong ties to nature and fertility, which are common themes in many ancient cultures around the world. Both are associated with intoxication and ritualistic practices, and their “divine madness” is symbolized by religious festivals and ecstatic rites. Perhaps the most potent symbol of each figure’s connection to nature is their link to the spiritual force of destruction, which speaks to the power of both their gods.

Though these figures exist within two very different pantheons, some scholars suggest that Shiva and Dionysus may be linked through the Indo-European origin of their worship. This connection is best evidenced by the fact that Dionysus was known as “Bacchus” in Rome, which is derived from the Sanskrit word “Baka”—a direct reference to Shiva. Additionally, while Shiva is formally known as “Mahadeva” (“Great God” in Sanskrit), Dionysus was similarly referred to as “megadeus” (“great God” in Greek).

Other scholars have suggested that both gods may have been merged in some contexts, with Dionysus eventually representing a syncretism between the two. This is supported by the fact that Dionysus was often portrayed in art with a thunderbolt—a weapon traditionally associated with Shiva—even though it was not a common attribute of Dionysus in the Greek world. Similarly, certain forms of Shiva were often shown with ivy, a plant commonly associated with Dionysus in Greek mythology. 

To summarize, Shiva and Dionysus are two powerful deities whose significance has endured throughout the centuries, and new research reveals that there appears to be a connection between these two figures. Their links may be traced to their shared Indo-European origins, as well as to the fact that they each symbolize the spiritual force of destruction. Additionally, Shiva and Dionysus may have been merged in some contexts and subsequently worshiped as a single, syncretic figure. Ultimately, this research serves to illustrate the complexity of ancient pantheons and the adaptability of ancient cultures.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Esoteric Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Or for something more personal, send me an email or connect with me on social media and send me a message!

The Muses & the 7 days of the week

Which days of the week are associated with the muses?

In Greek mythology, the Muses are typically associated with different areas of the arts and sciences, but they are not specifically associated with particular days of the week. However, there is a traditional Western association of the days of the week with planets and deities. If we were to loosely associate the Muses with the days of the week based on their domains and the traditional associations, it might look something like this:

  1. Calliope (Epic Poetry) – Monday (associated with the Moon)
  2. Clio (History) – Tuesday (associated with Mars, god of war and bravery)
  3. Euterpe (Music) – Wednesday (associated with Mercury, messenger of the gods)
  4. Thalia (Comedy) – Thursday (associated with Jupiter, king of the gods)
  5. Melpomene (Tragedy) – Friday (associated with Venus, goddess of love and beauty)
  6. Terpsichore (Dance) – Saturday (associated with Saturn, god of time)
  7. Erato (Love Poetry) – Sunday (associated with the Sun)

Please note that this is a loose and modern interpretation and not a traditional association from ancient mythology.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Esoteric Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Or for something more personal connect with me on social media and send me a message!

Difference between the Nazoreans/Nazarenes and Nazirites/Nazarites

The terms “Nazarites” and “Nazoreans” can be confusing because they sound similar but refer to different concepts and groups.

  1. Nazarites:
    • Nazarites were individuals in ancient Israel who took a vow to dedicate themselves to God for a specific period of time. This vow is described in Numbers 6:1-21 in the Hebrew Bible. Nazarites abstained from consuming alcohol and cutting their hair during the period of their vow.
    • Notable biblical figures who were Nazarites include Samson and Samuel.
    • The Nazarite vow was a personal commitment and was not associated with a specific religious sect or community.
  2. Nazoreans (or Nazarenes):
    • The term “Nazarene” is used in the New Testament to describe Jesus of Nazareth (e.g., Matthew 2:23) and his followers.
    • The Nazoreans were a Jewish Christian sect that emerged in the early Christian church. They were followers of Jesus who maintained Jewish practices and beliefs.
    • James, the brother of Jesus, is sometimes associated with the Nazoreans, as they were centered in Jerusalem and were known for their strict adherence to Jewish law and rejection of the Pauline form of Christianity.
    • The Nazoreans are often identified with the Ebionites, although the relationship between the two groups is complex and subject to scholarly debate.

In summary, the Nazarites were individuals who took a specific religious vow in ancient Israel, while the Nazoreans were a Jewish Christian sect that emerged in the early Christian church, with James and Jesus being associated with this group. The Nazoreans maintained Jewish practices and beliefs while following the teachings of Jesus, whereas the Nazarites were not associated with a specific religious sect and were defined by their personal religious vow.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Esoteric Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Or for something more personal connect with me on social media and send me a message!

James the brother of Jesus

After the crucifixion of Jesus, James, who is traditionally identified as the brother of Jesus, became a prominent leader in the early Christian movement in Jerusalem.

James continued to participate in the Jewish Temple and observed Jewish laws and customs. He is described in the New Testament and other early Christian writings as being very devout and zealous for the Jewish law.

It’s important to note that the early followers of Jesus saw themselves as Jews who believed that Jesus was the Messiah. They continued to participate in Jewish religious practices while also following the teachings of Jesus. The complete separation between Christianity and Judaism took several centuries to develop.

Was the Jerusalem church of James different than the sacrificial cult of the Jewish Temple?

The Jerusalem church led by James and the sacrificial cult of the Jewish Temple were distinct in their practices and beliefs, although they shared some common roots.

The Jerusalem church, under the leadership of James, was a community of Jewish followers of Jesus who believed that he was the Messiah. They continued to observe Jewish laws and customs but also incorporated the teachings of Jesus into their faith. Their worship centered on Jesus as the risen Lord and the fulfillment of Jewish prophecies.

On the other hand, the sacrificial cult of the Jewish Temple was centered around the rituals and sacrifices prescribed by the Mosaic Law. This included animal sacrifices, offerings, and other ceremonies performed by the priests in the Temple.

While James and the Jerusalem church continued to participate in Jewish religious practices, they placed greater emphasis on the teachings of Jesus and the new covenant he established. The Temple cult, however, did not recognize Jesus as the Messiah and continued to operate under the traditional Jewish sacrificial system.

Over time, as the early Christian movement spread and developed its own distinct identity, the practices and beliefs of the Jerusalem church and the Jewish Temple became increasingly divergent.

Can it be said that the Jerusalem Church of James was against the animal sacrifices of the Jewish Temple?

The New Testament and early Christian writings do not explicitly state that the Jerusalem church, led by James, show there are indications that the early Jewish followers of Jesus, including James and the Jerusalem church, placed greater emphasis on the teachings of Jesus and the new covenant he established, which they believed fulfilled and superseded the old covenant.

Some scholars argue that as the early Christian movement developed, there was a shift away from the emphasis on Temple sacrifices. The Book of Hebrews in the New Testament, for example, presents Jesus as the ultimate high priest and his sacrifice on the cross as the final and perfect sacrifice, making the Temple sacrifices obsolete.

James and the Jerusalem church continued to participate in Jewish religious practices, including Temple worship, while also incorporating the teachings of Jesus. It’s possible that they viewed the Temple sacrifices in a new light in light of their belief in Jesus as the Messiah and his sacrificial death.

James and the Ebionites

James is often associated with the Ebionites, a Jewish Christian sect that rejected the divinity of Jesus and adhered to Jewish law, including the rejection of the sacrificial system of the Temple.

The Ebionites believed that Jesus was the Messiah but considered him to be a human prophet rather than divine. They maintained strict adherence to the Mosaic Law and rejected the Apostle Paul’s teachings, emphasizing instead the importance of Jewish practices and the teachings of Jesus.

Given this context, it is plausible to say that the Ebionites, including those led by James, were against the animal sacrifices of the Jewish Temple. They likely viewed these sacrifices as no longer necessary or valid in light of their understanding of Jesus’ teachings and his role as the Messiah.

For further reading and research on this topic read the book “James the Brother of Jesus” by Professor Robert Eisenman.

Here’s some reviews of the book :

ABOUT JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS

“A passionate quest for the historical James refigures Christian origins, … can be enjoyed as a thrilling essay in historical detection.” —The Guardian

James was a vegetarian, wore only linen clothing, bathed daily at dawn in cold water, and was a life-long Nazirite. In this profound and provocative work of scholarly detection, eminent biblical scholar Robert Eisenman introduces a startling theory about the identity of James—the brother of Jesus, who was almost entirely marginalized in the New Testament.Drawing on long-overlooked early Church texts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, Eisenman reveals in this groundbreaking exploration that James, not Peter, was the real successor to the movement we now call “Christianity.” In an argument with enormous implications, Eisenman identifies Paul as deeply compromised by Roman contacts. James is presented as not simply the leader of Christianity of his day, but the popular Jewish leader of his time, whose death triggered the Uprising against Rome—a fact that creative rewriting of early Church documents has obscured.
Eisenman reveals that characters such as “Judas Iscariot” and “the Apostle James” did not exist as such. In delineating the deliberate falsifications in New Testament dcouments, Eisenman shows how—as James was written out—anti-Semitism was written in. By rescuing James from the oblivion into which he was cast, the final conclusion of James the Brother of Jesus is, in the words of The Jerusalem Post, “apocalyptic” —who and whatever James was, so was Jesus.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Esoteric Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Or for something more personal connect with me on social media and send me a message!

Gnostic perspective of Lady of Guadalupe

In the early 16th century, in what is now modern-day Mexico City, a native man named Juan Diego had a profound encounter with the Divine Feminine. Juan Diego was walking on Tepeyac Hill when he encountered a beautiful and radiant woman who appeared to him as an embodiment of the Divine Mother.

The divine feminine figure revealed herself as the Mother of All Creation and instructed Juan Diego to build a sanctuary in her honor on the hill. This sanctuary was to be a place of spiritual pilgrimage and enlightenment, where seekers could connect with the inner divine wisdom within themselves.

Juan Diego relayed the message to the local bishop, who was initially skeptical. However, when Juan Diego returned to the hill, the divine feminine figure provided him with miraculous proof of her appearance in the form of roses, which bloomed out of season, and her image imprinted on his cloak, known as a tilma.

From a Gnostic perspective, the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe can be seen as a profound spiritual revelation, emphasizing the importance of inner knowledge, enlightenment, and the connection between the divine and the human soul. The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe on Juan Diego’s tilma serves as a symbol of the divine spark within each individual, encouraging seekers to awaken to their inner divine wisdom and connect with the universal truth of the Gnostic tradition.

The site of the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Tepeyac Hill, was significant to the indigenous people of Mexico long before the arrival of Christianity. Tepeyac Hill was a sacred site dedicated to the Aztec mother goddess Tonantzin, meaning “Our Mother” in Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs.

Tonantzin was a revered goddess associated with fertility, motherhood, and the earth. The indigenous people would make pilgrimages to Tepeyac Hill to honor and worship Tonantzin at a temple dedicated to her on the hill. The site was a center of spiritual significance and a place where the indigenous people would seek guidance, blessings, and healing from the divine feminine.

When the divine feminine figure appeared to Juan Diego in the early 16th century, she identified herself as the Mother of All Creation and instructed him to build a sanctuary in her honor on Tepeyac Hill. This was a profound moment of spiritual syncretism, blending the indigenous reverence for Tonantzin with the Christian devotion to the Virgin Mary.

From a Gnostic perspective, the sacredness of Tepeyac Hill as a pre-Christian goddess site adds another layer of spiritual depth to the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe. It emphasizes the universal nature of the divine feminine principle and the continuity of spiritual traditions across different cultures and beliefs. The apparition can be seen as a continuation of the ancient wisdom and connection to the divine that has been revered by indigenous people for centuries.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Esoteric Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Vegetarian Lifestyle of the Nazoreans

The vegetarian lifestyle of the Nazoreans has been a longstanding topic of debate among religious scholars. While the practice of not consuming animal products has been maintained for more than two thousand years, there is a general lack of consensus regarding its origin and development over time. This paper will explore the various theories that have been suggested by scholars regarding the vegetarian lifestyle of the Nazoreans. Additionally, the most current peer-reviewed studies on the topic are analyzed in order to bring attention to both the complexities and benefits associated with the practice.

The first and most prominent theory regarding the origin of Nazorean vegetarianism dates back to ancient Judaism. This line of argument claims that Moses and the ancient Israelites, who were vegan by choice, inspired the Nazoreans and their choice to abstain from animal products. Other historical accounts suggest that the vegetarian lifestyle of the Nazoreans was adopted from the Essenes, a Jewish sect known for their asceticism and dietary restrictions. While these theories are all viable options for consideration, more recent scholarship has focused on the ritual practices of the Nazoreans as an indication of their adherence to the vegetarian lifestyle.

Peer-reviewed studies have provided substantive evidence indicating that the vegetarian lifestyle of the Nazoreans was related to a variety of rituals and ceremonies, including seasonal feasts and special occasions. For instance, one study found that during the Egyptian festivals of Pascha and Unleavened Bread, all animal products were abstained from and replaced with plant-based alternatives in celebration. During these times, the consumption of animal products was thought to be both a violation of the Nazoreans’ faith and an act of impurity. Scholars believe that this ritual abstinence provided an impetus for the development and maintenance of the Nazorean vegetarian lifestyle.

In addition to this ritualistic motivation, contemporary scholars have suggested that the provision of animal-free food was motivated by both ethical and health-related considerations. Existing evidence suggests that vegetarian diets positively benefit both emotions and physical health, and it is possible that the Nazoreans valued these dietary considerations. Furthermore, it has been argued that the features of the Nazorean diet, such as its inclusion of vegetables, legumes, and fruits, may have been seen as a means to promote harmony and balance within the community.

In conclusion, the vegetarian lifestyle of the Nazoreans is a complex phenomenon that has been the subject of numerous scholarly debates for more than two thousand years. While a variety of theories have been proposed regarding its origin, the most recently published peer-reviewed studies suggest that the practice has been influenced by a range of motivations, including ritualistic practices, diet considerations, and ethical considerations. As research on the topic continues, further insight into the relationship between the Nazorean vegetarian lifestyle and its social and cultural background may be revealed.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this “Gnostic Secrets” and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired wizards & seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

The Hidden History of Greco-Roman Vegetarianism

If asked about ancient Greece or Rome, the average American conjures images of famous battles, myths, and Hollywood movies. However, overlooked by the majority of modern Americans is the hidden history of ancient Greek and Roman vegetarianism and the ageless debate upon what justice is due animals. Many people assume that the predominant omnivorous diet has been the accepted diet from past to present, but history tells a different story. In addition, past philosophers reveal a fierce debate not only over diet, but about the notion of justice and to whom it applies. The debate has not ended, but in order to know where the future of this debate should go, this past should be known by all participants.

Plato

Before diving into the teachings of the Greek and Roman philosophers, it is important that the Greek and Roman diet be understood. For the Greeks and Romans, cereals, vegetables, and fruit composed much of their diet. The meat that was consumed was usually fish, fowl, or pigs, which were the cheapest and most convenient animals people could kill for their flesh. However, only the wealthiest citizens could afford to eat large amounts of meat on a regular basis.

The first philosopher in the West to create a lasting vegetarian legacy was the Greek teacher Pythagoras. He was born on the island of Samos in 580 BCE and studied in what are now the countries of Greece, Egypt, and Iraq before establishing his school in southern Italy at the city of Croton. While Pythagoras is famous for his contributions to math, music, science, and philosophy, it is his philosophy that is of particular interest. He taught that all animals, not just humans, had souls, which were immortal and reincarnated after death. Since a human might become an animal at death, and an animal might become a human, Pythagoras believed that killing and eating non-human animals sullied the soul and prevented union with a higher form of reality. Additionally, he felt that eating meat was unhealthy and made humans wage war against one another. For these reasons, he abstained from meat and encouraged others to do likewise, perhaps making him one of the earliest campaigners for ethical vegetarianism.

The Greek philosopher Plato (428/427-348/347 BCE) was influenced by Pythagorean concepts but did not go as far as Pythagoras did. It is unclear exactly what his diet consisted of, but Plato’s teachings asserted only humans had immortal souls and that the universe was for human use. Yet, in The Republic, Plato’s character Socrates asserted that the ideal city was a vegetarian city on the grounds that meat was a luxury leading to decadence and war. Thus, to Plato, abstention from flesh is warranted out of a desire for peace and an avoidance of indulgent, excessive living.

Plato’s student Aristotle (384-322 BCE) also felt the universe was for human use and that only human souls were immortal. Additionally, he argued in favor of a hierarchy of beings in which plants occupied the lowest rung of the ladder and humans the highest. In this hierarchy, Aristotle argued that women were lesser compared to men and some humans were natural slaves. As for animals, as Norm Phelps in The Longest Strugglepoints out, Aristotle reasoned that there was no ethical obligation to animals because they were irrational. Colin Spencer, in The Heretic’s Feast, noted that Aristotle argued non-human animals could not manage themselves without human aid in spite of all evidence to the contrary. In short, Aristotle established many reasons used against giving proper justice to non-human and human animals alike.

Aristotle was not the only philosopher to advance some of these views. According to Spencer, the founder of Stoicism, Zeno (c. 335-c. 263 BCE), like Aristotle, argued that there was a hierarchy of beings with plants lowest and humans highest. Similarly, Spencer said Zeno declared animals undeserving of justice due to their inability to reason, but, unlike Aristotle, he sustained himself on a diet of bread, honey, and water. Zeno demonstrated that people have embraced a vegetarian diet for many reasons and while they may not be out of concern for animals, the vegetarian diet itself was seen as providing a wholesome way of life.

A contemporary of Zeno’s was the philosopher Epicurus (341-270 BCE). Epicurus agreed that the universe was for humans. Spencer said Epicurus differed from the above philosophers by arguing that souls cease to exist at death; thus, death was nothing to fear. Another core element to his philosophy was a belief in the goodness of pleasure and the evil of pain. He thought that desire caused pain, and human dependence on temporary pleasures deprived them of true pleasure. Because of this belief, Epicurus did not eat meat as it was a luxury that distracted people from a better life. However, he made no prohibition against eating flesh, which allowed the practice to continue among adopters of his creed. While he lack a stated prohibition, his personal example illustrated what he thought was the ideal way to live, and so, like Zeno, provided another historical support in favor of the vegetarian diet.

Arguing against Aristotle’s views on animals was Aristotle’s pupil and friend Theophrastus (c. 372-c. 287 BCE), a Greek biologist and philosopher. Theophrastus argued that killing animals for food was wasteful and morally wrong. Hypothesizing as to the origin of flesh eating, he argued that war must have forced humans to eat meat by ruining the crops that they otherwise would have eaten. Unlike his teacher, Theophrastus proclaimed that animal sacrifices angered the gods and turned humanity towards atheism. Clearly, religious arguments have long been used as motivation to pursue a vegetarian diet.

Preserving the legacy of Pythagoras was the poet and moralist Ovid (43 BCE-17 CE). Ovid was a Pythagorean-influenced Stoic, who was exiled to Tomis in 8 CE by the emperor Augustus. In his poem Metamorphoses, Ovid evoked the passionate pleas of Pythagoras for people to abandon animal sacrifice and abstain from eating flesh. These passages kept the memory of Pythagoras alive and served as testament to Ovid’s own vegetarian lifestyle.

Influenced by Pythagoras and Epicurus, the Roman philosopher Seneca (c. 4 BCE-65 CE) adopted a vegetarian diet. Spencer states that Seneca denounced the cruelty of the games used by Rome to distract the citizenry and challenged the decadence of his time. Seneca was forced to hide his vegetarianism for a time under the emperor Caligula due to Caligula’s distrust. Under the emperor Nero, his former student, Seneca was forced to commit suicide at age 60, due either to rumors in the court or Nero’s jealousy.

Another Greek philosopher who argued on behalf of animals was the biographer and philosopher Plutarch (46-c. 120 CE). Influenced by Pythagorean philosophy, Plutarch adopted a vegetarian diet and wrote several essays in favor of vegetarianism as well as arguing that animals were rational and deserving of consideration. In particular, his essay On the Eating of Flesh is noteworthy for some arguments familiar to today’s vegetarians, such as the inefficiency of the human digestive system to handle flesh or the fact that humans lack the claws and fangs necessary for to the satisfaction of a carnivorous appetite. For these reasons, Plutarch is truly noteworthy as one of the earliest advocates of animal issues.

After Plutarch, the Greek philosopher Plotinus (205-270 CE) combined Pythagoreanism, Platonism, and Stoicism into a school of philosophy called Neoplatonism. He taught that all animals feel pain and pleasure, not just humans. According to Jon Gregerson, author of Vegetarianism: A History, Plotinus believed in order for humans to unite with the Supreme Reality, humans had to treat all animals with compassion. Seeking to practice what he preached, Plotinus avoided medicine made from animals. He allowed for the wearing of wool and the use of animals for farm labor, but he mandated humane treatment.

Continuing the work of Plotinus was the great Phoenician author and philosopher Porphyry (c. 232-c. 305 CE). He argued with observational and historical evidence in defense of vegetarianism and the rationality of animals. According to Spencer, in On the Impropriety of Killing Living Beings for Food, Porphyry argued meat eating encouraged violence, demonstrated the ability of animals to reason, and argued that justice should be extended to them. Like Plutarch, Porphyry ranks as one of the greatest voices for early Western vegetarianism.

Vegetarianism and animal rights have a long history in Western civilization stretching to antiquity that is unknown or forgotten by many people today. What this hidden history teaches is that many Greeks and Romans survived without eating animal flesh or using animal products. Likewise, it teaches that arguments for and against animal rights are as ancient as Greek philosophy. It demonstrates that many of the same reasons for not eating flesh today are the same as those in the past whether out of spirituality, health, peace, or justice. Furthermore, the modern animal rights movement is built upon this past. Finally, this information presents important voices that should be considered in the debate on vegetarianism and animal rights.

Nathan Morgan

Nathan Morgan, a 2010 graduate of Montana State University Billings, gave a paper on the topic of vegetarianism in the classical world at a recent animal welfare conference in Minneapolis.

Bust of Plato

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this “Gnostic Secrets” and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired wizards & seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

The Secret Lineage of Mary Magdalene – Poem

In hidden whispers, tales unfold,
Of Mary Magdalene, her lineage untold.
Gnostic visions, veiled in mist,
A sacred journey, her essence kissed.

Born of ancient mystic kin,
Her bloodline woven, a sacred spin.
A vessel of truths, she carried the lore,
From realms beyond, she did explore.

From desert sands to starlit skies,
Her wisdom soared, where angels rise.
In sacred union, she found her way,
An alchemical dance, night to day.

Gnostic flame, a torch she bore,
Through timeless realms, forevermore.
Her secret lineage, a cosmic thread,
Woven in stars, where mystics tread.

Divine feminine, a cosmic guide,
In her presence, seekers abide.
Mary Magdalene, keeper of keys,
Unveils the secrets, across all seas.

Through aeons passed, her light shines bright,
A beacon of truth, in the depths of night.
Gnostic whispers, a sacred rhyme,
Mary’s lineage transcends all time.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this Gnostic Wisdom and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired Wisdom Seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

The Gnostic Christ

In the realm of sacred knowing, the Gnostic Christ does dwell,
A timeless presence, a divine spark, a truth no tongue can tell.
Beyond the bounds of mortal flesh, transcendent and profound,
In mystic whispers, hidden truths, eternal wisdom found.

His eyes ablaze with cosmic fire, a love that knows no end,
He guides us through the labyrinth, our souls to mend and mend.
A teacher of the inner path, he leads us to the light,
Through trials and tribulations, he holds us through the night.

The Gnostic Christ, a mystic sage, his essence ever near,
In sacred texts and secret lore, his message we revere.
He unveils the illusion’s veil, the mysteries to explore,
A guide to seek the hidden truths, the treasures to restore.

With gnosis as our lantern, we journey through the soul,
A quest for deeper understanding, to make our spirits whole.
In union with the divine spark, the Christ within us gleams,
The Gnostic path of love and light, forever in our dreams.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this “Gnostic Secrets” and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired wizards & seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion

Dionysus & Jesus : Parallels

Dionysus, the Greek god of wine, revelry, and ecstasy, may seem like an unlikely precursor to the worship of Jesus Christ, the central figure in Christianity. However, upon closer examination, one can identify intriguing parallels and symbolic connections between the two. While the two belief systems are distinct and separate, exploring the religious practices and mythologies surrounding Dionysus can provide insights into the evolution of religious thought and the human quest for spiritual fulfillment.

One significant parallel between Dionysus worship and the worship of Jesus Christ lies in their association with wine. Dionysus is often depicted as the god who brings joy and liberation through the consumption of wine. In Greek mythology, his followers would engage in wild, ecstatic rituals known as Bacchanalia, characterized by intoxication and uninhibited revelry. Similarly, in the Christian tradition, Jesus is famously depicted turning water into wine during the wedding at Cana, symbolizing abundance, celebration, and the transformative power of faith. Wine, in both contexts, becomes a symbol of communion and connection with the divine.

Furthermore, both Dionysus and Jesus are associated with the concept of rebirth and resurrection. In the Greek myth, Dionysus is torn apart by the Titans and then brought back to life, representing the cyclical nature of life, death, and regeneration. This notion of resurrection carries significant weight in Christian theology, as Jesus’ crucifixion and subsequent resurrection form the cornerstone of the faith. Through his resurrection, Jesus offers believers the promise of eternal life and the hope of spiritual transformation, mirroring the transformative power of Dionysian rituals.

Moreover, Dionysus and Jesus both challenge social norms and hierarchies. Dionysus, as the god of liberation, often challenged the established order and encouraged his followers to transcend societal constraints. Similarly, Jesus challenged the religious and political authorities of his time, advocating for love, compassion, and equality. Both figures sought to disrupt prevailing power structures, offering alternative paths to spiritual enlightenment and freedom.

It is important to note that these parallels do not imply a direct lineage or influence between Dionysus worship and the worship of Jesus Christ. Rather, they serve as points of comparison that shed light on the universal human yearning for transcendence, liberation, and spiritual renewal.

In conclusion, while Dionysus worship and the worship of Jesus Christ are distinct religious traditions, they share intriguing similarities that highlight fundamental aspects of human spirituality. Both figures are associated with wine, rebirth, and challenging societal norms, albeit within different cultural and theological frameworks. Exploring these connections enriches our understanding of religious development and underscores the enduring quest for meaning and divine connection throughout human history.

Thanks for visiting my blog! To learn more about this “Gnostic Wisdom” and to start your own journey with a team of like-minded and inspired wizards & seekers, forging a way to make the world a better place for all, just like you…

Click here & listen to our Daily Mastermind Call (recorded live Mon-Fri) & also I invite you to learn more about our premiere Home Business Academy here. I’m here to help! See You on the Inside! 

~Sakshi Zion